AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
![]() This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.ĭata Availability: The data to replicate the findings presented in the study is publicly available on GitHub. Received: JanuAccepted: AugPublished: October 20, 2022Ĭopyright: © 2022 Braesemann et al. To make remote work an effective tool for economic and rural development, it would need to be complemented by local skill-building, infrastructure investment, and labour market programmes.Ĭitation: Braesemann F, Stephany F, Teutloff O, Kässi O, Graham M, Lehdonvirta V (2022) The global polarisation of remote work. Locations without access to these enabling institutions-in many cases, rural areas-fall behind. metropolitan areas focused on information and communication technologies. These forces pull remote work to places with institutions that foster specialisation and complex economic activities, i. The findings suggest that agglomerative forces linked to the unequal spatial distribution of skills, human capital, and opportunities shape the global geography of remote work. Thirdly, remote work is polarised along the skill axis: workers with in-demand skills attract profitable jobs, while others face intense competition and obtain low wages. ![]() Secondly, remote jobs are pulled to large cities rural areas fall behind. First, countries are globally divided: North American, European, and South Asian remote platform workers attract most jobs, while many Global South countries participate only marginally. Specifically, in how far could remote work connect employers and workers in different countries? Does it bring jobs to rural areas because of lower living costs, or does it concentrate in large cities? And how do skill requirements affect competition for employment and wages? We use data from a fully remote labour market-an online labour platform-to show that remote platform work is polarised along three dimensions. However, our understanding of the geographies of remote work is limited. ![]() ![]() Remote work could connect labour markets, but it might also increase spatial polarisation. The Covid-19 pandemic has led to the rise of digitally enabled remote work with consequences for the global division of labour. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |